Alex May 24, at 4: All teaching has always been to evaluate understanding and comprehension by way of a test. If education in America were a for profit enterprise, it would have died the ignominious death it so deserves Before May 24, at 6:
By Kenneth Bernstein You are a college professor. I have just retired as a high school teacher. I have some bad news for you.
In case you do not already see what is happening, I want to warn you of what to expect from the students who will be arriving in your classroom, even if you teach in a highly selective institution. While it is true that the US Department of Education is now issuing waivers on some of the provisions of the law to certain states, those states must agree to other provisions that will have as deleterious an effect on real student learning as did No Child Left Behind—we have already seen that in public schools, most notably in high schools.
Troubling Assessments My primary course as a teacher was government, and for the last seven years that included three or four out of six sections of Advanced Placement AP US Government and Politics.
My students, mostly tenth-graders, were quite bright, but already I was seeing the impact of federal education policy on their learning and skills.
With test scores serving as the primary if not the sole measure of student performance and, increasingly, teacher evaluation, anything not being tested was given short shrift. Further, most of the tests being used consist primarily or solely of multiple-choice items, which are cheaper to develop, administer, and score than are tests that include constructed responses such as essays.
Even when a state has tests that include writing, the level of writing required for such tests often does not demand that higher-level thinking be demonstrated, nor does it require proper grammar, usage, syntax, and structure. Thus, students arriving in our high school lacked experience and knowledge about how to do the kinds of writing that are expected at higher levels of education.
Recognizing this, those of us in public schools do what we can to work on those higher-order skills, but we are limited. Remember, high schools also have tests—No Child Left Behind and its progeny such as Race to the Top require testing at least once in high school in reading and math.
High schools are also forced to focus on preparing students for tests, and that leads to a narrowing of what we can accomplish in our classrooms.
I mentioned that at least half my students were in AP classes.
The explosive growth of these classes, driven in part by high school rankings like the yearly Challenge Index created by Jay Mathews of the Washington Post, is also responsible for some of the problems you will encounter with students entering your institutions. The College Board did recognize that not everything being labeled as AP met the standards of a college-level course, so it required teachers to submit syllabi for approval to ensure a minimal degree of rigor, at least on paper.
But many of the courses still focus on the AP exam, and that focus can be as detrimental to learning as the kinds of tests imposed under No Child Left Behind.
I served several times as a reader for the examination that follows the course. I saw several problems. If a student hits the points on the rubric, he or she gets the points for that rubric. There is no consideration of grammar or rhetoric, nor is credit given or a score reduced based on the format of the answer.
A student who takes time to construct a clear topic sentence and a proper conclusion gets no credit for those words. Thus, a teacher might prepare the student to answer those questions in a format that is not good writing by any standard. If, as a teacher, you want your students to do their best, you have to have them practice what is effectively bad writing— no introduction, no conclusion, just hit the points of the rubric and provide the necessary factual support.
Some critical thinking may be involved, at least, but the approach works against development of the kinds of writing that would be expected in a true college-level course in government and politics. My students did well on those questions because we practiced bad writing. My teaching was not evaluated on the basis of how well my students did, but I felt I had a responsibility to prepare them for the examination in a way that could result in their obtaining college credit.
I would like to believe that I prepared them to think more critically and to present cogent arguments, but I could not simultaneously prepare them to do well on that portion of the test and teach them to write in a fashion that would properly serve them at higher levels of education.
Even during those times when I could assign work that required proper writing, I was limited in how much work I could do on their writing. I had too many students. In my final year, with four sections of Advanced Placement, I had AP students as well as an additional forty-six students in my other two classes.
A teacher cannot possibly give that many students the individualized attention they need to improve their writing. Imagine that I assign all my students a written exercise. If it takes a more realistic five minutes per paper, the total is more than thirteen hours. Further, the AP course required that a huge amount of content be covered, meaning that too much effort is spent on learning information and perhaps insufficient time on wrestling with the material at a deeper level.Free attendance papers, essays, and research papers.
Family Income and School Attendance - Introduction The purpose of this study was to examine if there was any connection between family income and school attendance and achievement in the early years of education, specifically in kindergarten through fourth grade.
In the #commoncore Project, authors Jonathan Supovitz, Alan Daly, Miguel del Fresno and Christian Kolouch examine the intense debate surrounding the Common Core State Standards education reform as it played out on Twitter. Oct 21, · The History of Special Education and the Laws Associated with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Latrena Y.
Haynes Grand Canyon University: SPE - March 05, Abstract Special education is a type of education for students with special needs. Essay on Special Education and Nclb. Special Education and NCLB I am particularly interested in special education.
I feel that students who require special instructions are increasing on a daily basis; therefore, special education should be given much emphasis and consideration.
Effects Of The No Child Left Behind Act Education Essay. Print Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. n.d). A subgroup can consist of poverty levels, race, ethnicity, special needs students and limited English proficiency students ("No.
There’s a related trick, where pre-existing narratives are such that someone can take one example and have the unspoken weight of that narrative behind them when they want to do whatever — even if the response proves the opposite, because, you see, the response is just an attempt at correcting the problem described in the narrative.