And aesthetic judgements, especially literary judgements, are often corrupted in the same way as political ones. It would be difficult for an Indian Nationalist to enjoy reading Kipling or for a Conservative to see merit in Mayakovsky, and there is always a temptation to claim that any book whose tendency one disagrees with must be a bad book from a literary point of view.
Some perennial issues remain unaddressed. For example, rooms are still over-crowded for certain popular sessions. I could have predicted, for example, that the DisruptTexts and TeachLivingPoets sessions would be full to bursting based on chat participation, but neither were in big rooms.
On the other hand, my session, which was up against the ALAN Breakfast and some heavy hitters see belowhad scant attendance, and we were in a ballroom. We are still an echo chamber to some extent. I tweeted this out twice during the conference: Potentially unpopular opinion, but putting it out there: Who are we not hearing from that we should?
I realize not everyone goes every year to hear them, but there are folks presenting multiple sessions, and they do it every year. And some of these folks have great, innovative ideas. But we need to share the floor. I have presented several times, too—six times since Some of the folks I am talking about have presented six times in the last two years or less.
I also know some folks who were in the session in which writer Sarah Cortez apparently said some hurtful, homophobic, bigoted things. Clearly, it was not something the fellow panelists should have had to address. We were deeply sorry to learn, and continue to be saddened by, the fact that panelists and attendees experienced hateful comments from a panelist during a session on Saturday.
I hated missing Adichie. He is a dynamic speaker, and I enjoyed hearing from him. I skipped a D session so I could eat and check out the exhibits. I only went to the exhibit hall this one time.
The more often I attend this conference, the less interested I am in the exhibit hall. Dismantling and Rebuilding Reimagining? We missed Kim Parker, but the group shared a stellar rationale for why we need to do this work and how we can do it—even if we have limited options about changing our curriculum, we can still disrupt it.
I do hope they will share their slide deck. It looked like they had linked some interesting things on the slides themselves and also cited some research worth digging into.
Josh Thompson took good Twitter notes see the entire thread: Front and center for disrupttexts. So many disruptors in here! I have a renewed interest in poetry.
I admit I had let this interest slide because I was looking in the wrong places. We are in the midst of a poetry renaissance, and we need to be sharing these poets with our students. The picture at the top of this post includes all the books I heard about from TeachLivingPoets either before or at the conference.
I went to two sessions with the TeachLivingPoets crew: The Argument for Poetry: Both sessions were fantastic, and the great news is that both groups shared their slides and are linked above. My research in graduate school concerns eliminating grades, so I went to J.
Report Cards that Motivate: Including Student Voice in Assessment. My last session was N. Teaching for Social Justice in the Age of Trump: Exploring Empathy and Vulnerability in a Divided America.
This was a panel crafted from separate proposals, I gather. Meredith Stewart and her colleague Laura Price from Cary Academy, North Carolina, shared some interesting ideas about an American video essay assignment. They were great, and the assignment looks really intriguing. Nothing new and nothing to report.AP English Language and Composition Course Description— This is the core document for this course.
It clearly lays out the course content and describes the exam and AP Program in general. The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue.
This is the foliage of destiny. Today, in our seventh installment of What does it really take to get into the Ivy League?, we turn from the substance and content of your applications to more strategic timberdesignmag.com course, if you don’t have the substance, this won’t get you in – but if you screw the strategy part up, it can still keep you out.
Top Successful College Essays. Get into the college of your dreams! We hope these essays inspire you as you write your own personal statement.
Just remember to . Essays referencing a website, get your essay written for you uk, ratio and proportion homework help. The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue.